HF3483 (Legislative Session 94 (2025-2026))
Trespass offenses modified to require a warrant signed by a judicial officer for immigration enforcement, and detention of persons subject to civil immigration detainers issued by the federal government prohibited.
Related bill: SF3771
AI Generated Summary
Purpose
- To change how trespass offenses are handled on private property and premises, by adding a requirement for a warrant signed by a judicial officer when immigration enforcement is involved.
- To prohibit the detention of people who are subject to federal civil immigration detainers issued by the federal government.
Main Provisions
Warrant requirement for immigration enforcement on premises
- An offense is created for entering or remaining on another person’s premises with the intent to enforce civil immigration laws without a warrant signed by a judicial officer and without probable cause to believe the person is on the premises.
- A “judicial officer” is defined as a judge or United States magistrate judge, or a court clerk authorized to sign warrants under the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.
Prohibition on detention based on federal immigration detainers
- State and local authorities cannot detain a person solely because of a federal civil immigration detainer.
Expanded definitions related to trespass
- Premises: real property and any appurtenant building or structure.
- Dwelling: the building or part used as a place of residence, full-time or part-time.
- Construction site: site where building work (construction, alteration, painting, or repair) is happening.
- Owner or lawful possessor: the person on whose behalf work is done, including the general contractor or subcontractor.
- Posted: signs and postings that warn against trespass, with specific placement and size requirements.
- Signs and posting rules: signs must be conspicuously placed; specific size, content, and frequency rules are described (e.g., at least 8.5 inches by 11 inches, warnings against trespass, legible lettering, posted at regular intervals).
Specific trespass offenses and do-not-enter rules
- A person commits a misdemeanor if they:
- Enter or remain on another’s premises in ways that violate the defined trespass offenses.
- Enter the dwelling or posted building without right or owner consent, except in emergencies.
- Enter premises to take fruit, trees, or vegetables without permission.
- Enter premises for civil immigration enforcement without a warrant and without probable cause.
- Enter cemeteries outside posted hours.
- Return to property after being told to leave and not to return, without right or consent.
- Enter locked or posted construction sites or aggregate mining sites without consent unless they are a business licensee.
- Cross into or enter areas cordoned off by a peace officer engaged in official duties (with an affirmative defense if a peace officer permits entry).
- Areas cordoned off by a peace officer can be entered only if permitted by the officer.
Exceptions and defenses
- Business licensees (such as building trades workers) may be allowed on locked/posted construction sites or aggregate mining sites without the owner’s consent.
Significant Changes to Existing Law
- Adds a required warrant for on-premises immigration enforcement actions, shifting authority from a potential detainer or informal action to a judicially authorized process.
- Introduces a clear prohibition on detaining individuals solely on federal immigration detainers, aligning state/local practice with the need for due process.
- Creates new or expanded trespass offenses focused on immigration enforcement and restricts entry to certain sensitive areas without a warrant.
- Strengthens posting and signage requirements for property owners to deter trespass, including specific sign dimensions and placement.
- Provides an affirmative defense for entry into restricted areas when allowed by a peace officer.
Practical Implications
- Law enforcement and immigration enforcement on private property will require a judicially signed warrant to detain or arrest someone for immigration reasons.
- Individuals cannot be detained by state or local authorities simply due to a federal civil immigration detainer.
- Property owners and managers have clearer requirements for posting and securing premises, with defined consequences for trespass related to immigration enforcement.
- Authorized workers on construction or mining sites (business licensees) have clarified access, while others face stricter trespass penalties.
Relevant Terms - trespass - premises - dwelling - construction site - posted - owner or lawful possessor - business licensee - judicial officer - warrant - civil immigration enforcement - immigration detainer - probable cause - peace officer - cordoned off area - sign (posting requirements)
Bill text versions
- Introduction PDF PDF file
Past committee meetings
- Judiciary Finance and Civil Law on: March 10, 2026 10:15
- Judiciary Finance and Civil Law on: March 03, 2026 10:15
Actions
| Date | Chamber | Where | Type | Name | Committee Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| February 19, 2026 | House | Action | Introduction and first reading, referred to | Judiciary Finance and Civil Law | |
| February 23, 2026 | House | Action | Authors added | ||
| February 25, 2026 | House | Action | Author added | ||
| February 26, 2026 | House | Action | Author added | ||
| March 12, 2026 | House | Action | Author added |
Citations
[
{
"analysis": {
"added": [],
"removed": [],
"summary": "Cites Minnesota Statutes 2024 section 609.605 subdivision 1.",
"modified": []
},
"citation": "609.605",
"subdivision": "1"
},
{
"analysis": {
"added": [],
"removed": [],
"summary": "Cites Minnesota Statutes 2024 section 609.605 subdivision 2.",
"modified": []
},
"citation": "609.605",
"subdivision": "2"
},
{
"analysis": {
"added": [],
"removed": [],
"summary": "Cites Minnesota Statutes 2024 section 609.605 subdivision 4.",
"modified": []
},
"citation": "609.605",
"subdivision": "4"
},
{
"analysis": {
"added": [],
"removed": [],
"summary": "Cites Minnesota Statutes 2024 section 609.605 subdivision 4a.",
"modified": []
},
"citation": "609.605",
"subdivision": "4a"
},
{
"analysis": {
"added": [],
"removed": [],
"summary": "Cites Minnesota Statutes 2024 section 609.581 subdivision 2.",
"modified": []
},
"citation": "609.581",
"subdivision": "2"
},
{
"analysis": {
"added": [],
"removed": [],
"summary": "Cites Minnesota Statutes 168.002 subdivision 16.",
"modified": []
},
"citation": "168.002",
"subdivision": "16"
},
{
"analysis": {
"added": [],
"removed": [],
"summary": "Cites Minnesota Statutes 626.84 subdivision 1.",
"modified": []
},
"citation": "626.84",
"subdivision": "1"
},
{
"analysis": {
"added": [],
"removed": [],
"summary": "Cites Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure Rule 9.",
"modified": []
},
"citation": "Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure Rule 9",
"subdivision": ""
}
]Progress through the legislative process
In Committee
Sponsors
- Rep. Kaela Berg (DFL)
- Rep. Brion Curran (DFL)
- Rep. Sandra Feist (DFL)
- Rep. Leigh Finke (DFL)
- Rep. Mike Freiberg (DFL)
- Rep. Kari Rehrauer (DFL)
- Rep. Michael Howard (DFL)
- Rep. Katie Jones (DFL)
- Rep. Liz Lee (DFL)
- Rep. Tina Liebling (DFL)
- Rep. Anquam Mahamoud (DFL)
- Rep. Mohamud Noor (DFL)
- Rep. Jay Xiong (DFL)
- Rep. Cheryl Youakim (DFL)
- Rep. Alexander Falconer (DFL)
- Rep. Cedrick Frazier (DFL)
- Rep. Aisha Gomez (DFL)
- Rep. Kelly Moller (DFL)
- Rep. Dan Wolgamott (DFL)