Purpose

Clarifies the role and limits of the Minnesota Attorney General (AG) when pursuing civil law enforcement actions on behalf of the state. The bill aims to ensure actions are in the public interest and not the private legal representation of any single department or agency, and it sets rules about who is a party to those actions, who owns and can access records, and how information can be shared.

Key Provisions

Subdivision 5: AG action and party status

• When the AG files a civil law enforcement action on behalf of the state under any authority (common law, constitutional, or statutory), the AG acts in the public interest of the state.
• The AG does not act as the legal representative for any particular department, agency, board, commission, or other state instrumentality.
• Unless the action expressly names a department/agency/board/commission or instrumentality in subdivision 8, those entities are not automatically parties to the action.
• Records, documents, data, knowledge, and information of other state entities are not subject to party discovery that is served on the AG.
• The records and information of other state entities are not in the AG’s possession, custody, or control for the purposes of the action.

Subdivision 6: Agency custodianship of records

• Each agency is the sole custodian of its own records.
• Departments, agencies, boards, commissions, or other entities in state government are the only entities authorized to be the custodians of their own records, documents, data, knowledge, and information, and they are the only ones in possession, custody, or control of those records.

Subdivision 7: Attorney General representation and access to records

• Records maintained by a division of the AGO because of an attorney-client relationship with a state agency are not accessible to the AGO divisions that prosecute civil actions on behalf of the state.
• This does not limit an agency from sharing records with the AGO in accordance with applicable law or lawful requests.

Subdivision 8: Party status and discovery

• No public officer or other state instrumentality shall be considered a party or subjected to party discovery in litigation unless expressly named as a party.
• A civil law enforcement action started by the AG on behalf of the state does not automatically satisfy the requirements to be treated as having those entities as parties.

Significant Changes to Existing Law

• Reframes AG civil enforcement actions as actions in the public interest, not as representation of specific state entities.
• Eliminates automatic status as a party for most state departments/agencies/boards/commissions unless expressly named.
• Establishes that each state agency is the sole custodian of its own records, shifting control of records away from the AG in many civil actions.
• Limits the AGO’s access to records maintained by its own divisions when they relate to representing state agencies, while allowing lawful sharing.
• Introduces stricter rules about party discovery, requiring explicit naming to be treated as a party in litigation.

Summary in Plain Terms

• The bill says the Attorney General fights for the state as a whole, not for any single department.
• Most state agencies aren’t automatically involved as parties in these civil cases, and their internal records aren’t automatically shared with the AG or used in the case.
• Each agency keeps its own records and decides who can see them, and the AG’s divisions can’t always access those records.
• If a department wants the AG to be involved in a case as a party, it must be named explicitly.

Relevant Terms - attorney general - civil law enforcement action - state government - public interest - department - agency - board - commission - instrumentality - party discovery - records - documents - data - knowledge - information - custodian - possession - control - attorney-client relationship - Office of the Attorney General - division - common law - constitution - on behalf of the state