HF3871

Venue in child sexual abuse material law provided; on-scene preview of digital evidence in child sexual abuse material investigations; possession, sale, creation, dissemination, and purchase of child-like sex dolls prohibited; and defense of duress modified to include victims of trafficking.
Legislative Session 94 (2025-2026)

Related bill: SF4292

AI Generated Summary

Purpose

This bill aims to strengthen public safety related to child sexual abuse material (CSAM) by changing where CSAM offenses can be prosecuted and by adding a new at-scene procedure for handling digital evidence. It also includes broader changes noted in its overview, such as prohibitions related to childlike sex dolls and adjustments to the duress defense for trafficking victims, and would modify several Minnesota statutes.

Main provisions

  • Venue for CSAM offenses

    • The bill adds new venue options for prosecuting offenses involving CSAM.
    • For offenses under the CSAM statute, a case may be prosecuted in:
    • the county where the offense occurred, or
    • the county of residence of the accused or the victim, or
    • if venue cannot be located in those counties, the county where CSAM is produced, reproduced, found, stored, received, promoted, disseminated, or possessed in violation of the statute.
    • These venue rules would apply to the existing CSAM statute provisions and are added as new subdivisions in the relevant statutory sections.
  • Onscene digital evidence preview

    • The bill creates a new provision (Section 617.275) allowing a limited onscene preview of digital devices or media at the location of a search warrant execution.
    • Subdivision 1 (Authority): When a court issues a search warrant for electronic devices or digital media to find CSAM, investigators may conduct an onscene preview at the location.
    • Subdivision 2 (Preview): The onscene preview is limited to identifying, confirming, and documenting the presence or absence of CSAM as defined in the CSAM statute. Any further forensic analysis must occur in a digital forensics lab under a separate, court-issued warrant specific to that device or media.
    • Subdivision 3 (Safeguards): The preview must use forensic methods that preserve data integrity and ensure admissibility in court. If no CSAM is found, the device should be returned to the owner or possessor as soon as practicable, consistent with other laws.
    • Subdivision 4 (Warrant): A separate warrant is not needed for the limited onscene preview if the underlying warrant already authorizes the search for CSAM.
    • Subdivision 5 (Scope): The onscene preview does not diminish existing constitutional protections under the Fourth Amendment or related state constitutional provisions.
  • Other statutory and enforcement context (as indicated in the bill overview)

    • The bill would amend Minnesota statutes referenced in 2024 and 2025 supplements, including sections related to CSAM offenses and related provisions.
    • It also mentions additions related to prohibiting possession, sale, creation, dissemination, and purchase of childlike sex dolls, and modifications to the duress defense to include trafficking victims (specific statutory language outlined in the bill’s overview).

How this changes existing law

  • Expanded venues for CSAM prosecutions

    • Courts would have broader options for where CSAM cases can be tried, potentially enabling cases to be heard in counties closer to the offense, the victim, or where CSAM activity occurred.
  • New onscene digital evidence handling

    • Law enforcement and forensic teams can perform a limited at-scene preview of digital devices during the execution of a CSAM search warrant, speeding up the identification of CSAM.
    • Any deeper analysis would require a separate court-issued warrant and would take place in a controlled lab environment, preserving data integrity and legal admissibility.
  • Protections and limits

    • The onscene preview is tightly scoped to CSAM-related questions and designed to preserve constitutional rights. If no CSAM is found, devices should be returned promptly.
  • Conforming amendments

    • The bill would add new subdivisions to existing CSAM statutes and related sections, aligning venue and evidence procedures across the statutes it touches.

Potential impacts

  • For victims and the public

    • May increase the likelihood that CSAM cases are prosecuted in a venue with clearer connections to the offense or the individuals involved.
    • Faster at-scene identification of CSAM could help secure evidence more quickly, potentially aiding investigations and prosecutions.
  • For defendants and due process

    • Expanded venue could affect where a case is heard.
    • The onscene preview is designed to protect data integrity and Fourth Amendment rights while streamlining evidence gathering.
  • For law enforcement and prosecutors

    • Provides a clear framework for when and how to perform limited onscene previews and when to move to lab-based forensic analysis.

Relevant Terms - Child sexual abuse material (CSAM) - Venue - Notwithstanding (venue-specific language) - CSAM offenses (617.246, 617.247) - Onscene forensic preview - Electronic devices - Digital media - Search warrant - Digital forensics lab - Forensic integrity - Admissibility - Fourth Amendment - Minnesota Statutes (617.246, 617.275, 617.247) - CSAM production, reproduction, storage, dissemination - Childlike sex dolls (prohibition in overview) - Duress defense (trafficking victims)

Bill text versions

Showing the most recent version. There are  1  total versions. You must be logged in  to view additional bill text versions.

Past committee meetings

You must be logged in  to view 1  past legislative committee meetings.

Actions

DateChamberWhereTypeNameCommittee Name
March 02, 2026HouseActionIntroduction and first reading, referred toPublic Safety Finance and Policy
March 25, 2026HouseActionAuthor added
Showing the 5  most recent stages. This bill has 2  stages in total. Log in to view all stages

Meeting documents

You must be logged in  to view legislative committee meeting documents.

Citations

You must be logged in  to view citations.

Progress through the legislative process

17%
In Committee

Sponsors

You must be logged in  to view sponsors.

Loading…