HF3875

Judiciary policy bill.
Legislative Session 94 (2025-2026)

Related bill: SF4064

AI Generated Summary

Purpose

This bill focuses on judiciary operations and procedures in Minnesota. It seeks to clarify how court notices are published, update data privacy and sharing rules for court and public safety data, adjust restitution and conciliation court rules, reform no-fault arbitration processes, clarify notices to public authorities in dissolution cases, and set up reporting and expiration rules for the Supreme Court Council on Child Protection (including related funding).

Main Provisions

Data privacy and sharing (Sec. 1)
  • Reframes what constitutes private versus confidential data held by the Department of Public Safety.
  • Increases clarity on when certain data (including Social Security numbers and race/ethnicity data) can be released to specific agencies and for specific purposes (e.g., law enforcement, debt collection, tax administration, health care recovery, jury lists).
  • Allows selective sharing of race/ethnicity data with the judicial branch for compiling the jury source list.
  • Prohibits selling or sharing Social Security numbers beyond stated purposes.
  • Maintains confidentiality for driving ability data when it comes from a family member.
Mandatory binding arbitration (Sec. 2)
  • Requires the supreme court and district courts to provide for mandatory binding arbitration of small-claim disputes at issue in auto no-fault (reparation) cases, and related auto damage coverage disputes, for claims up to defined monetary thresholds (generally up to $20,000, with a $4,000 threshold if the claim is a consumer credit transaction).
Disclosure to the judiciary for jury lists (Sec. 3)
  • Requires the commissioner to disclose to the judicial branch a list of individuals 17 or older who file tax returns or receive tax benefits, including full name, date of birth, address, county of residence, and, if available, race and ethnicity data. This is for the purpose of compiling the jury source list.
District court publication on the web (Sec. 4)
  • Allows the district court to publish its own court notices, orders, and processes for judicial proceedings on the judicial branch website.
Conciliation court jurisdiction and procedures (Sec. 5)
  • Increases the monetary limit for conciliation court civil claims to up to $20,000 (and $4,000 for consumer credit transactions).
  • Establishes a definition of “consumer credit transaction” and sets conditions for its applicability.
  • States that conciliation court jurisdiction is generally coextensive with the county where the court is established.
  • Details service and summons procedures (mail service, certified mail for higher amounts, nonresident service rules, and alternatives to certified mail).
  • Outlines subpoena service for witnesses and documents.
Notice to public authorities in dissolution cases (Sec. 6)
  • Requires notifying public authorities in dissolution, legal separation with children, determination of parentage, or child custody cases if either party receives public assistance or applies for it during the proceedings.
  • Mandates including the parties’ full names, Social Security numbers, and birth dates in the notice.
  • Directs the court to set child support according to existing guidelines and may order support in various forms (including through a share of bonuses or other compensation).
  • Allows approval of a stipulation if both parties are represented by independent counsel and the stipulation meets applicable guidelines; otherwise, the court determines a specific dollar amount using the guidelines and other factors.
Restitution judgments—administrative renewals (Sec. 7)
  • Permits administrative renewal of restitution judgments by service of notice on the offender.
  • Renewal is done by mail, without new filing fees, in the same case file.
  • Renewal amount equals unpaid principal plus accrued unpaid interest and may be renewed multiple times until fully satisfied.
Child protection reporting and expiration (Secs. 8–9)
  • Requires the Supreme Court Council on Child Protection to file progress and final reports:
    • Progress report due by mid-2025.
    • Final blueprint report due by late-2026.
  • Sets the council to expire after submitting its final report by June 30, 2027.
Funding and onetime appropriation (Sec. 10)
  • Allocates a one-time appropriation of $1,000,000 in fiscal year 2025 for the establishment and administration of the Supreme Court Council on Child Protection, available until June 30, 2027 (the text notes possible date adjustments in related provisions).

Significant Changes to Existing Law

  • Expands or reorganizes data sharing and privacy rules for public safety data, including use of race/ethnicity data for jury lists.
  • Introduces mandatory binding arbitration for small auto no-fault and related claims, altering how certain disputes are resolved.
  • Allows district courts to published notices and processes on the judicial branch website, increasing online access to court information.
  • Raises the monetary limit for conciliation court jurisdiction and clarifies rules around service and consumer credit transactions.
  • Strengthens procedures requiring notice to public authorities in dissolution cases and broadens child support calculations and forms of payment.
  • Establishes administrative renewal procedures for restitution judgments, reducing procedural barriers to renewing unpaid restitution.
  • Creates and funds the Supreme Court Council on Child Protection, with a defined sunset date and reporting requirements.

How It Could Affect People

  • Individuals involved in dissolution or child custody cases may see more extensive notice requirements to public authorities and potentially changes in child support calculations.
  • People with small-claims disputes related to auto no-fault or auto damage may be directed to binding arbitration sooner.
  • Jurors may be selected from a broader data set (including race/ethnicity data) as part of the jury source list process.
  • Restitution judgments may be renewed automatically, reducing the likelihood of lapse due to administrative delays.
  • District courts will have more online presence for publishing notices, potentially increasing transparency.

Relevant Terms - public safety data, private data, confidential data - Social Security numbers (SSNs) - race and ethnicity data; jury source list - district court notices; publication on judicial branch website - conciliation court; civil claims; consumer credit transaction - no-fault/arbitration; reparation benefits - dissolution proceedings; child support; public assistance - restitution judgments; administrative renewal - Supreme Court Council on Child Protection; final report; progress report - funding; onetime appropriation - jury source list; court notices; service by certified mail; nonresident service

If you’d like, I can tailor this summary for a specific audience (e.g., students, legal professionals) or convert it into a shorter brief.

Bill text versions

Showing the most recent version. There are  3  total versions. You must be logged in  to view additional bill text versions.

Past committee meetings

You must be logged in  to view 2  past legislative committee meetings.

Actions

DateChamberWhereTypeNameCommittee Name
April 27, 2026SenateActionReceived from House
April 27, 2026SenateActionIntroduction and first reading
April 27, 2026SenateActionReferred toRules and Administration
April 28, 2026SenateActionComm report: Rule 45-amend, subst. General Orders
April 28, 2026SenateActionSecond reading
Showing the 5  most recent stages. This bill has 8  stages in total. Log in to view all stages

Meeting documents

You must be logged in  to view legislative committee meeting documents.

Citations

You must be logged in  to view citations.

Progress through the legislative process

50%
Passed Chamber

Sponsors

You must be logged in  to view sponsors.

Loading…