HF3971
Evidentiary standards applying to Tax Court proceedings regarding property valuations modified.
Legislative Session 94 (2025-2026)
Related bill: SF4191
AI Generated Summary
Purpose
- This bill changes how the Tax Court reviews property valuation appeals for property tax purposes. It introduces de novo review (fresh consideration) of appeals, allows for an advisory jury, requires public hearings, and specifies who bears the burden of proving the valuation. It also shapes how certain evidence, like the Department of Revenue’s sales ratio study, can be used in these cases.
Main Provisions
De Novo Appeals and Public Hearings
- The Tax Court must hear, consider, and determine each appeal without a jury on a fresh basis (de novo).
- A Tax Court judge may appoint an advisory jury upon the judge’s motion.
- The Tax Court is required to hold a public hearing in every case, with parties allowed to present evidence and arguments.
- In property valuation appeals, the unit of government (the government side) has the burden of proving the validity of the valuation.
Burden of Proof
- In appeals concerning property valuation for property tax, the government must establish the validity of the valuation. This represents a shift in who bears the burden in these cases.
Original Proceeding
- An appeal from a decision of the commissioner or another government unit is treated as an original proceeding to set aside or modify that order or determination.
Absence of Appellants
- If no appellant appears, the Tax Court must affirm the government’s order or determination.
Evidence and Sales Ratio Study
- If the Department of Revenue’s sales ratio study is used as evidence, its data may be admissible only as provided in the existing statutory framework (section 278.05 subdivision 1).
Filing and Process
- The commissioner, the taxpayer, and other parties to the appeal may file notices, documents, and other information with the Tax Court in a manner approved by the Tax Court.
Significant Changes to Existing Law
- Replaces or supplements previous evidentiary standards with:
- De novo review in Tax Court appeals of property valuations.
- Optional advisory jury for certain hearings.
- Mandatory public hearings for transparency.
- Clear assignment of the burden of proving valuation validity to the government in property valuation cases.
- A clearer framework for when and how evidence like the sales ratio study can be admitted.
Terminology and Concepts (Key Terms from Text)
- Tax Court
- de novo
- advisory jury
- public hearing
- burden of establishing the validity of the valuation
- property valuation
- property tax purposes
- commissioner (of revenue)
- appropriate unit of government
- order or determination
- original proceeding (in the nature of a suit to set aside or modify)
- sales ratio study
- Department of Revenue
- section 278.05 subdivision 1 (evidentiary rule reference)
- notices, documents, information (filing with Tax Court)
Relevant Terms - Tax Court, de novo, advisory jury, public hearing, burden of proof, valuation validity, property valuation, commissioner of revenue, unit of government, original proceeding, sales ratio study, admissible evidence, filing with Tax Court.
Past committee meetings
You must be logged in to view 1 past legislative committee meetings.
Actions
| Date | Chamber | Where | Type | Name | Committee Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| March 05, 2026 | House | Action | Introduction and first reading, referred to | Taxes | |
| April 16, 2026 | House | Action | Author added | ||
| Showing the 5 most recent stages. This bill has 2 stages in total. Log in to view all stages | |||||
Meeting documents
You must be logged in to view legislative committee meeting documents.
Citations
You must be logged in to view citations.
Progress through the legislative process
In Committee
Sponsors
You must be logged in to view sponsors.