HF3971 (Legislative Session 94 (2025-2026))
Evidentiary standards applying to Tax Court proceedings regarding property valuations modified.
Related bill: SF4191
AI Generated Summary
Purpose
- This bill changes how the Tax Court reviews property valuation appeals for property tax purposes. It introduces de novo review (fresh consideration) of appeals, allows for an advisory jury, requires public hearings, and specifies who bears the burden of proving the valuation. It also shapes how certain evidence, like the Department of Revenue’s sales ratio study, can be used in these cases.
Main Provisions
De Novo Appeals and Public Hearings
- The Tax Court must hear, consider, and determine each appeal without a jury on a fresh basis (de novo).
- A Tax Court judge may appoint an advisory jury upon the judge’s motion.
- The Tax Court is required to hold a public hearing in every case, with parties allowed to present evidence and arguments.
- In property valuation appeals, the unit of government (the government side) has the burden of proving the validity of the valuation.
Burden of Proof
- In appeals concerning property valuation for property tax, the government must establish the validity of the valuation. This represents a shift in who bears the burden in these cases.
Original Proceeding
- An appeal from a decision of the commissioner or another government unit is treated as an original proceeding to set aside or modify that order or determination.
Absence of Appellants
- If no appellant appears, the Tax Court must affirm the government’s order or determination.
Evidence and Sales Ratio Study
- If the Department of Revenue’s sales ratio study is used as evidence, its data may be admissible only as provided in the existing statutory framework (section 278.05 subdivision 1).
Filing and Process
- The commissioner, the taxpayer, and other parties to the appeal may file notices, documents, and other information with the Tax Court in a manner approved by the Tax Court.
Significant Changes to Existing Law
- Replaces or supplements previous evidentiary standards with:
- De novo review in Tax Court appeals of property valuations.
- Optional advisory jury for certain hearings.
- Mandatory public hearings for transparency.
- Clear assignment of the burden of proving valuation validity to the government in property valuation cases.
- A clearer framework for when and how evidence like the sales ratio study can be admitted.
Terminology and Concepts (Key Terms from Text)
- Tax Court
- de novo
- advisory jury
- public hearing
- burden of establishing the validity of the valuation
- property valuation
- property tax purposes
- commissioner (of revenue)
- appropriate unit of government
- order or determination
- original proceeding (in the nature of a suit to set aside or modify)
- sales ratio study
- Department of Revenue
- section 278.05 subdivision 1 (evidentiary rule reference)
- notices, documents, information (filing with Tax Court)
Relevant Terms - Tax Court, de novo, advisory jury, public hearing, burden of proof, valuation validity, property valuation, commissioner of revenue, unit of government, original proceeding, sales ratio study, admissible evidence, filing with Tax Court.
Bill text versions
- Introduction PDF PDF file
Actions
| Date | Chamber | Where | Type | Name | Committee Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| March 05, 2026 | House | Action | Introduction and first reading, referred to | Taxes |
Citations
[
{
"analysis": {
"added": [
"Requires Tax Court to hear appeals de novo.",
"Allows the Tax Court judge to empanel an advisory jury upon the judge's motion.",
"Requires a public hearing in every case and opportunity for evidence and argument.",
"In property valuation cases, the unit of government bears the burden of establishing the validity of the valuation."
],
"removed": [],
"summary": "This bill modifies evidentiary standards applying to Tax Court proceedings regarding property valuations by amending Minnesota Statutes 2024, section 271.06, subdivision 6.",
"modified": [
"Clarifies that orders are prima facie valid except that, in property valuation cases, the governmental unit bears the burden of proving the valuation."
]
},
"citation": "271.06",
"subdivision": "6"
},
{
"analysis": {
"added": [
"Sales ratio data introduced in Tax Court is admissible only as provided in section 278.05, subdivision 1.4."
],
"removed": [],
"summary": "This bill modifies the admissibility framework for sales ratio data in Tax Court proceedings by amending Minnesota Statutes 2024, section 278.05, subdivision 3.",
"modified": [
"Links admissibility of sales ratio data to the provisions of 278.05, subdivision 1.4."
]
},
"citation": "278.05",
"subdivision": "3"
},
{
"analysis": {
"added": [],
"removed": [],
"summary": "Cross-reference to Minnesota Statutes 278.05, subdivision 1.4 as the governing standard for admissibility of sales ratio data referenced in the bill.",
"modified": []
},
"citation": "278.05",
"subdivision": "1.4"
}
]Progress through the legislative process
In Committee