HF4183 (Legislative Session 94 (2025-2026))

Requirements necessary for a health carrier to discontinue individual health plans eliminated, and state exception for a health carrier's uniform modification of coverage under an individual market health plan established.

Related bill: SF4562

AI Generated Summary

Purpose

  • This bill changes Minnesota law to make it easier for health insurers to discontinue certain individual health plans and to allow specific, uniform changes to coverage. It keeps some consumer protections in place, such as guaranteed renewal, while adding new steps and oversight for plan discontinuations and modifications.

Main Provisions

  • Discontinuing an individual health plan

    • A health carrier may discontinue a particular type of individual health plan, but must follow a process:
    • Tell the insurance commissioner in writing about the plan discontinuation plans by May 1 of the year before the change.
    • Send written notice to every policyholder enrolled in the plan at least 90 days before the coverage ends.
    • Offer to each enrolled person the option to buy another plan in the individual market on a guaranteed issue basis (no medical underwriting for eligibility).
    • Act uniformly with all similarly situated plans and enrollees.
    • The insurance commissioner can disapprove the discontinuation within 60 days if it’s not in Minnesota policyholders’ best interests. When deciding, the commissioner may consider factors like how many people are enrolled and whether there are other comparable plan options available.
    • An insurer may discontinue a plan without commissioner approval if the plan is not a catastrophic or platinum-level plan, the plan has fewer than 25 enrollees, or the plan is grandfathered.
  • Guaranteed renewal requirements

    • Existing guaranteed renewal rules require that an individual health plan:
    • Be renewed at a premium rate that does not use the enrollee’s health status or claims experience after the plan’s initial issuance.
    • Renewals must still meet all other applicable requirements.
    • An enrollee can be denied renewal only for:
      • Nonpayment or fraud,
      • The enrollee no longer lives in the carrier’s licensed area,
      • The carrier discontinues issuing or renewing all of its individual plans in Minnesota (as allowed under the bill’s discontinuation rules).
  • Uniform modification of coverage (exception and rules)

    • A health carrier may modify a health plan for a product in the individual market if the modification is applied uniformly to all individuals with that product, and only at renewal.
    • Modifications made to comply with federal or state requirements are considered uniform if they are:
    • Implemented within a reasonable time after the requirement is imposed or modified, and
    • Directly related to that requirement.
    • Other uniform modifications are allowed if they meet these criteria:
    • The product is offered by the same health carrier (or a related carrier within a controlled group).
    • The product keeps the same network type (e.g., HMO, PPO, etc.).
    • The product continues to cover a majority of the same service area.
    • The cost-sharing structure remains the same, except for changes due to medical cost fluctuations or to keep the same metal level (bronze/silver/gold/platinum).
    • The product provides the same benefits, except for changes that would affect the plan’s index rate within a plus/minus two percentage point range (not counting changes required by law).

Key Changes to Existing Law

  • Expanded process for discontinuing certain individual health plans, including notice to the commissioner and policyholders, and a potential commissioner disapproval, with specific exceptions for very small plans or grandfathered plans.
  • Tightened but clarified rules around guaranteed renewal, ensuring plans still renew without considering health status or claims experience, except for standard disqualifiers (nonpayment, fraud, moving out of area, or complete discontinuation of all plans).
  • Introduced a formal framework for uniform modification of coverage, allowing changes at renewal to be applied across all similarly situated enrollees and clarifying when such changes count as uniform (including compliance-related modifications and standardized changes to cost-sharing and benefits within defined limits).

Oversight and Compliance

  • The insurance commissioner has authority to review proposed discontinuations and may disapprove plans if in the best interests of policyholders.
  • A formal appeal process is available if a discontinuation decision is made.
  • A limited pathway exists for carriers to discontinue plans without commissioner approval under specified criteria (non-catastrophic/platinum status, very small enrollment, or grandfathered status).

Additional Notes

  • References in the bill to federal law and terms like “catastrophic or platinum-level” plans and “guaranteed issue” are kept to align state rules with federal standards and current market practices.
  • The bill defines technical terms such as “product,” “network type,” “plan-adjusted index rate,” and “metal level” to describe how uniform modifications must work.

Practical Impact for Consumers

  • More types of individual plans may be discontinued, with advance notice and an offer to switch to another plan.
  • Consumers are protected by guaranteed renewal rules, reducing the risk of sudden non-renewal, except under limited circumstances.
  • Insurers can adjust coverage more uniformly to meet legal requirements or standardized changes, but must do so in a way that stays consistent for all enrollees in the same product.

Potential Trade-offs

  • Fewer distinct types of plans may remain in the market if carriers discontinue many plan types.
  • The balance between plan options and consumer protections depends on how the commissioner exercises disapproval authority and how plans are redesigned under uniform modification rules.

Relevant Terms

  • guaranteed renewal
  • premium rate
  • claims experience
  • health status
  • enrolled / enrollee
  • policyholder
  • health carrier
  • individual health plan
  • discontinue / discontinuation
  • guaranteed issue
  • may disapprove
  • commissioner
  • May 1 notice deadline
  • 90-day policyholder notice
  • catastrophic plan
  • platinum-level plan
  • grandfathered plan
  • product
  • uniform modification of coverage
  • network type
  • cost-sharing
  • plan-adjusted index rate
  • metal level (bronze, silver, gold, platinum)
  • Section 62A.65
  • United States Code title 42 section 18022
  • Code of Federal Regulations title 45 section 144.103
  • controlled group (as related to carriers)

(End of summary)

Bill text versions

Upcoming committee meetings

Actions

DateChamberWhereTypeNameCommittee Name
March 12, 2026HouseActionIntroduction and first reading, referred toCommerce Finance and Policy

Citations

 
[
  {
    "analysis": {
      "added": [
        "Requirement that guaranteed renewal applies with premium rates not based on claims experience or health status after initial issuance.",
        "Enumerated grounds for non-renewal of an individual health plan."
      ],
      "removed": [],
      "summary": "This amendment to Minnesota Statutes Section 62A.65 subdivision 2 addresses guaranteed renewal of individual health plans, including premium-rate protections and enumerated grounds for non-renewal.",
      "modified": []
    },
    "citation": "62A.65",
    "subdivision": "2"
  },
  {
    "analysis": {
      "added": [
        "Written notice to the commissioner and to individual policyholders before discontinuation.",
        "Commissioner may disapprove discontinuation within 60 days based on Minnesota policyholders' best interests.",
        "Offer to each individual policyholder affected by discontinuation to purchase another plan on a guaranteed issue basis."
      ],
      "removed": [],
      "summary": "Adds and clarifies the process to discontinue an individual health plan, including notice requirements and potential commissioner involvement.",
      "modified": [
        "Creates a structured discontinuation framework aligned with guaranteed renewal provisions."
      ]
    },
    "citation": "62A.65",
    "subdivision": "2a"
  },
  {
    "analysis": {
      "added": [
        "Explicit reference to chapter 14 contested-case procedures for appeals of the commissioner’s decisions."
      ],
      "removed": [],
      "summary": "References to the Minnesota Administrative Procedure Act's contested-case procedures.",
      "modified": []
    },
    "citation": "Minnesota Statutes chapter 14",
    "subdivision": ""
  },
  {
    "analysis": {
      "added": [
        "New subdivision enabling uniform modification of coverage for a product when required by federal/state requirements.",
        "Defines that such modifications may occur at renewal and must be uniform for all individuals with that product.",
        "Outlines criteria for when other types of modifications are considered uniform."
      ],
      "removed": [],
      "summary": "Adds Subdivision 2b, providing an exception for uniform modification of coverage.",
      "modified": [
        "Introduces a formal framework for uniform modification of coverage alongside existing renewal/discontinuation provisions."
      ]
    },
    "citation": "62A.65",
    "subdivision": "2b"
  },
  {
    "analysis": {
      "added": [],
      "removed": [],
      "summary": "Cites federal regulation governing uniform modification of coverage for certain health plans.",
      "modified": [
        "References to federal requirements governing uniform modifications under CFR 45.144.103."
      ]
    },
    "citation": "Code of Federal Regulations, Title 45, Section 144.103",
    "subdivision": ""
  },
  {
    "analysis": {
      "added": [],
      "removed": [],
      "summary": "Defines catastrophic and platinum-level health plans for purposes of discontinuation without commissioner approval.",
      "modified": [
        "Incorporates federal definitions of catastrophic and platinum-level plans."
      ]
    },
    "citation": "42 U.S.C. § 18022",
    "subdivision": ""
  },
  {
    "analysis": {
      "added": [],
      "removed": [],
      "summary": "Federal reference related to plan-adjusted index rate in the context of uniform modification.",
      "modified": [
        "Incorporates the standard for how plan-adjusted index rates may vary under uniform modification ( CFR 45.156.80(d)(2) )."
      ]
    },
    "citation": "Code of Federal Regulations Title 45 Section 156.80(d)(2)",
    "subdivision": ""
  },
  {
    "analysis": {
      "added": [],
      "removed": [],
      "summary": "Federal cross-reference regarding uniform modification standards and related controlled-group considerations.",
      "modified": [
        "References to uniform modification standards under CFR 45.147.106(d)."
      ]
    },
    "citation": "Code of Federal Regulations Title 45 Section 147.106(d)",
    "subdivision": ""
  },
  {
    "analysis": {
      "added": [],
      "removed": [],
      "summary": "Cross-reference to 62K.06 subdivision 4, relevant to cost-sharing structure and metal level considerations in modifications.",
      "modified": [
        "Acknowledges that uniform modifications should preserve cost-sharing structures and metal-level characteristics as defined."
      ]
    },
    "citation": "62K.06",
    "subdivision": "4"
  },
  {
    "analysis": {
      "added": [],
      "removed": [],
      "summary": "Cross-reference defining grandfathered health plans.",
      "modified": []
    },
    "citation": "62A.011",
    "subdivision": "1b"
  }
]

Progress through the legislative process

17%
In Committee
Loading…