HF595 (Legislative Session 94 (2025-2026))
Election judge party affiliation classified as public data on individuals.
Related bill: SF640
AI Generated Summary
Purpose
This bill changes how data about election judges’ political party affiliation is treated. It requires that the major political party affiliation of election judges (or a notice of no affiliation) be treated as public data and stored in a publicly accessible list. It also repeals a prior rule that allowed sharing of this information only among election judges within the same precinct for balance checks.
Main Provisions
- Section 1: Adds to existing data practices rules that the party affiliation of election judges is classified as public data, following the rules in another section (204B.21 subdivision 4).
- Section 2: Adds a new requirement to 204B.21 establishing a process where each appointing authority must keep a list of all election judges with their major party affiliation or a statement of no affiliation. This list is public data on individuals.
- Section 3: Repeals a previous provision (204B.21 subdivision 3) that allowed sharing of an election judge’s party affiliation with other election judges in the same precinct for party balance checks, with a restriction that the information not be disclosed or used for other purposes.
Significant Changes to Existing Law
- Public data classification: Election judge major party affiliation becomes public data.
- New public list: Each appointing authority must maintain a public list of election judges and their major party affiliations (or non-affiliation).
- Removal of limited sharing: The prior exception allowing judges to share affiliation information for balance verification is repealed; under the new scheme, the data is publicly available rather than restricted for internal use.
Practical Implications
- Increased transparency: The party affiliations of election judges will be accessible to the public.
- Privacy considerations: Judges’ political affiliations will no longer be restricted to insiders, which may raise privacy concerns for some individuals.
- Administrative change: Agencies must create and maintain a public list of election judges with party affiliation.
Relevant Terms - election judge - party affiliation - major political party affiliation - public data on individuals - appointing authority - list of election judges - balance requirements - data practices (Minnesota Data Practices Act) - Minnesota Statutes 2024 section 13.607 - Minnesota Statutes 2024 section 204B.21
Actions
| Date | Chamber | Where | Type | Name | Committee Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| February 13, 2025 | House | Action | Introduction and first reading, referred to | Judiciary Finance and Civil Law |
Citations
[
{
"analysis": {
"added": [
"Subd.10.Election judge party affiliation."
],
"removed": [],
"summary": "Amends Minnesota Statutes 2024 section 13.607 by adding Subd.10 to classify the election judge party affiliation as public data, referencing the new data classification in 204B.21 subdivision 4.",
"modified": [
"Incorporates another data classification by tying to 204B.21 subdivision 4."
]
},
"citation": "13.607",
"subdivision": "subd.10"
},
{
"analysis": {
"added": [
"Subd.4.Election judge major party affiliation data classification."
],
"removed": [],
"summary": "Adds Subd.4 to Minnesota Statutes 2024 section 204B.21 to classify election judges' major party affiliation data, requiring an appointing authority to maintain a public list of major party affiliations.",
"modified": [
"Establishes that a list of election judges with major party affiliation is public data on individuals."
]
},
"citation": "204B.21",
"subdivision": "subd.4"
},
{
"analysis": {
"added": [],
"removed": [
"Minnesota Statutes 2024 section 204B.21 subdivision 3 is repealed."
],
"summary": "Repeals Minnesota Statutes 2024 section 204B.21 subdivision 3.",
"modified": [
"Eliminates Subd.3 of 204B.21."
]
},
"citation": "204B.21",
"subdivision": "subd.3"
},
{
"analysis": {
"added": [],
"removed": [],
"summary": "Contains the phrase \"Notwithstanding section 13.43\" to support cross-reference within the bill; indicates reliance on existing data practices provisions.",
"modified": [
"Cross-references existing Minnesota Statutes 13.43 in connection with data sharing for election judge party affiliation."
]
},
"citation": "13.43",
"subdivision": ""
}
]Progress through the legislative process
In Committee