Purpose

• Establish a Minnesota framework (Minnesota Statutes chapter 533) to recognize and regulate electronic non-testamentary estate planning documents and electronic signatures.
• Align electronic estate planning practices with other laws and evolving technology, while allowing reasonable accommodations for people with hearing, vision, or speech impairments.

Main Provisions

• Key definitions

  • Electronic: technology with electrical, digital, magnetic, wireless, optical, electromagnetic, or similar capabilities.
  • Electronic presence: being in a state and communicating with another person by electronic means in real time, with sight and sound, to roughly the same extent as being in a physical location (includes reasonable accommodations).
  • Electronic record: information stored, generated, sent, received, or stored by electronic means.
  • Electronic signature: an electronic symbol, signature, mark, or process attached to or associated with a record with the intent to sign.
  • Non-testamentary estate planning document: a record relating to estate planning that is not a will (includes documents like trusts, powers of attorney, advance directives, guardian nominations, etc.).
  • Power of attorney, trust instruments, advance directives, health care directives, guardianship nominations, and other listed records are included as non-testamentary estate planning documents.
  • Will and electronic will: defined in law, but this act applies to non-testamentary documents (not the will itself).

• Scope and limits

  • Applies to electronic non-testamentary estate planning documents and electronic signatures on them.
  • Does not apply to non-testamentary documents if the document precludes use of electronic records or signatures.
  • Does not affect the validity of electronic records or signatures that are valid under other Minnesota laws (e.g., UETA, Uniform Probate Code, Real Property Electronic Recording Act).

• Construction and purpose

  • The chapter is to facilitate electronic estate planning documents and signatures and be consistent with reasonable electronic practices.

• Recognition and effect

  • An electronic non-testamentary estate planning document or its electronic signature may not be denied legal effect or enforceability solely because it is electronic.
  • If another law requires a writing or a signature, an electronic record or electronic signature can satisfy that requirement, unless specifically prohibited.

• Attribution and impact

  • An electronic document or signature is attributed to a person if it was the person’s act, which can be shown through security procedures or other evidence.
  • The context and surrounding circumstances at the time of creation determine the effect of attribution.

• Notarization and acknowledgment

  • Notarization or similar requirements can be satisfied with an electronic signature tied to the required information, in line with the law of the state where execution occurs.

• Witnessing and attestation

  • In cases where the law requires a person to sign, witness, or attest, electronic signatures and electronic witnessing are permitted.
  • If presence is required, electronic presence satisfies the requirement.

• Retention of electronic records

  • If law requires keeping or filing, an electronic record that accurately reflects the final form and remains accessible satisfies the requirement.
  • Retention rules can allow use of third-party services.
  • Some information necessary only to send/receive a record may be exempt from retention requirements.

• Certification of paper copy

  • A person can create a certified paper copy of an electronic non-testamentary estate planning document by sworn statement that the copy is complete and true.
  • The certified paper copy is presumed true and has the same effect as the original electronic record unless proven otherwise.

• Admissibility in evidence

  • Evidence about electronic non-testamentary estate planning documents or their electronic signatures may not be excluded solely because it is electronic.

Practical Implications

• For individuals and families
  • Greater flexibility to use electronic signatures and records for many non-testamentary estate planning tasks (e.g., trusts, powers of attorney, advance directives, guardian nominations).
  • Increased ability to sign and store these documents electronically while maintaining legal validity.
• For professionals and institutions
  • Notaries, attorneys, and courts can rely on electronic signatures and electronic records consistent with these standards.
  • Electronic witnessing and electronic presence provisions may streamline remote or online estate planning processes.

Significant Changes Compared to Prior Law

• Creates a formal framework (Minnesota Statutes chapter 533) to recognize electronic non-testamentary estate planning documents and electronic signatures.
• Explicitly defines and expands concepts like electronic presence and electronic signature for estate planning contexts.
• Allows electronic records and signatures to satisfy requirements for writing, signing, notarization, witnessing, and attestation where allowed by law.
• Provides mechanisms for retaining and certifying electronic records and for creating certified paper copies with the same legal effect as originals.
• Clarifies that the act applies only to non-testamentary documents and does not override provisions for electronic wills, but defines wills within the broader statutory context.

Relationship to Other Law

• Not a replacement for existing electronic transaction or probate laws; sections reference compatibility with the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (UETA), Uniform Probate Code (UPC), and the Minnesota Real Property Electronic Recording Act.
• The act does not affect the validity of electronic records or signatures already governed by those laws.
• Electronic wills are defined but governed outside of the scope of this chapter (non-testamentary focus).

Potential Considerations

• Cross-jurisdiction use: how electronic estate planning documents created in Minnesota are treated in other states.
• Technology reliance: requires secure procedures to verify signers and protect against fraud; security procedures are a defined part of the act.
• Accessibility: electronic presence provisions aim to support people with disabilities, but practical implementation may vary.

---

Relevant Terms - Uniform Electronic Estate Planning Documents Act - Minnesota Statutes chapter 533 - electronic - electronic presence - electronic record - electronic signature - non-testamentary estate planning document - power of attorney - trust instrument - health care directive - advance directive - nomination of a guardian - guardian for a minor child or disabled adult child - will - electronic will - notarization - acknowledgment - witnessing - presence or conscious presence - retention - certified paper copy - admissibility in evidence - security procedure - attribution - electronic presence - UETA (Uniform Electronic Transactions Act) - Uniform Probate Code (UPC) - Real Property Electronic Recording Act