SF3639

Counties authorization to require watershed districts to use sources other than watershed district tax levy to complete projects
Legislative Session 94 (2025-2026)

AI Generated Summary

Purpose

  • This bill gives counties more control over how watershed districts fund their projects. It allows counties to prohibit watershed districts from levying taxes and to require the districts to use alternative funding sources. It also creates a process for counties to review and suggest changes to proposed project costs and funding.

Main Provisions

  • Section 1 (amendment to Minnesota Statutes 2024 section 103D.915 subdivision 2):
    • The county auditor adds the watershed district’s levy to the county’s tax levies and distributes it through the county treasurer in the same way as other taxes. The levy remains in addition to other county taxes, unless otherwise changed by this bill.
  • Section 2 (new funding alternatives in Minnesota Statutes 2024 section 103D.917):
    • Subdivision 1. A county may prohibit a watershed district from levying taxes authorized under this chapter and may require the watershed district to identify alternative funding sources to complete projects. If a watershed district spans more than one county, a prohibition by one county prevents all counties in that district from levying taxes under section 103D.915 subdivision 2.
    • Subdivision 2. A watershed district must comply with a county’s request to review proposed project costs and funding sources. A county may suggest modifications to the funding plan and cost-saving measures.

Significant Changes to Law

  • Introduces explicit county authority to prohibit watershed districts from levying taxes and to require alternative funding sources for projects.
  • Establishes that a prohibition by any one county in a multi-county watershed district effectively applies to all counties in that district.
  • Creates a formal process for counties to review and recommend changes to project funding and costs.

Implementation Implications

  • Funding for watershed district projects could shift away from tax levies toward alternative sources identified by counties.
  • Watershed districts may need to adjust project proposals to align with county feedback on costs and funding.
  • Tax collection mechanics may change only if counties exercise the new prohibition and funding-requirement options.

Relevant terms (to aid search and understanding) - watershed district - county - levy - tax levy - county auditor - county treasurer - settlement - funding alternatives - alternative funding sources - cost-saving measures - project funding - 103D.915 subdivision 2 - 103D.917 - multi-county watershed district - prohibition on levying taxes

Relevant Terms

  • watershed district
  • county
  • levy
  • tax levy
  • county auditor
  • county treasurer
  • settlement
  • funding alternatives
  • alternative funding sources
  • cost-saving measures
  • project funding
  • 103D.915 subdivision 2
  • 103D.917
  • multi-county watershed district
  • prohibition on levying taxes

Bill text versions

Showing the most recent version. There are  1  total versions. You must be logged in  to view additional bill text versions.

Actions

DateChamberWhereTypeNameCommittee Name
February 19, 2026SenateActionIntroduction and first reading
February 19, 2026SenateActionReferred toEnvironment, Climate, and Legacy
Showing the 5  most recent stages. This bill has 2  stages in total. Log in to view all stages

Citations

You must be logged in  to view citations.

Progress through the legislative process

17%
In Committee

Sponsors

You must be logged in  to view sponsors.

Loading…