SF4548 (Legislative Session 94 (2025-2026))
Ban local elected officials from entering certain nondisclosure agreements
AI Generated Summary
Purpose
The bill aims to promote transparency by banning local elected officials from entering nondisclosure agreements (NDAs) or similar contracts that would restrict public disclosure of information about potential data center development within the official’s own political subdivision. If such an agreement is made, it is considered void and unenforceable, and any void parts must be severed from the rest of the contract. If a violative contract is entered, the official must publicly disclose it.
Main Provisions
- Prohibits a local elected official from entering into a nondisclosure agreement or any contract that restricts public disclosure of information about a potential data center development within the boundaries of the official’s political subdivision.
- Any agreement or contract term that tries to restrict disclosure in this way is void and unenforceable.
- If a contract contains a void provision, that portion must be severed from the rest of the contract, and the remaining terms stay in effect.
- If a local elected official enters into a contract that violates the above prohibition, the official must publicly disclose the contract or agreement.
Definitions
- Data center: The term is defined as it is in Minnesota law (as used in the bill, it refers to data center development).
- Local elected official: Includes members such as city council members, mayors, county commissioners, watershed district managers, town supervisors, and any other elected official created by a home rule charter.
Enforcement, Severability, and Disclosure
- The prohibitions apply to contracts or agreements within the official’s political subdivision.
- Void provisions must be severed, ensuring the rest of the contract remains enforceable if possible.
- Public disclosure is required for any contract that violates the prohibition.
Impact and Rationale
- Changes state law to reduce secrecy around potential data center development by local officials.
- Aims to ensure transparency and accountability in decisions about data center projects by preventing confidential deals or nondisclosure agreements that hide information from the public.
Significant Changes to Existing Law
- Creates a new restriction under Minnesota Statutes Chapter 471 (Section 471.372) on nondisclosure agreements by local elected officials regarding potential data center development.
- Introduces explicit rules that such agreements are void and unenforceable, mandating severability of void terms and public disclosure of violative contracts.
Relevant Terms nondisclosure agreement, NDA, public disclosure, data center development, local elected official, political subdivision, void and unenforceable, severability, contract, disclosure, home rule charter, data center (216B.02(11)).
Bill text versions
- Introduction PDF PDF file
Upcoming committee meetings
- State and Local Government on: March 24, 2026 11:00
Actions
| Date | Chamber | Where | Type | Name | Committee Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| March 18, 2026 | Senate | Action | Introduction and first reading | ||
| March 18, 2026 | Senate | Action | Referred to | State and Local Government |
Citations
[
{
"analysis": {
"added": [
"Adds new section 471.372 establishing nondisclosure restrictions for local elected officials."
],
"removed": [],
"summary": "The bill references Minnesota Statutes chapter 471 as the governing framework for local government and proposes adding a new section within that chapter to restrict nondisclosure agreements by local elected officials.",
"modified": []
},
"citation": "471",
"subdivision": ""
},
{
"analysis": {
"added": [],
"removed": [],
"summary": "The bill uses the definition of 'data center' as provided in Minnesota Statutes section 216B.02, subdivision 11.",
"modified": []
},
"citation": "216B.02",
"subdivision": "11"
}
]Progress through the legislative process
In Committee