SF4827

The bill aims to change how counties handle state mandates by requiring funding before a county must follow a state mandate. In short, counties would not have to comply with a state mandate unless the state provides enough revenue to pay for it.

No Mandates Without Funding: A county is not required to comply with a state mandate until the state provides the necessary revenue to cover the mandate.
Definition of a Mandate for County Compliance: A state mandate that counties are not required to comply with under the funding rule is one that: 1) affects the daily operation of the county government, 2) changes the allocation of the county’s resources, or 3) changes the county's spending priorities.
Legislative Change to Statutes: The bill proposes codifying this rule in Minnesota Statutes, specifically adding to chapters 373 and 471 (as indicated by the intended coding).

Creates a funding prerequisite for mandate compliance: Counties would only be obligated to implement state mandates once adequate funding is provided.
Expands the criteria for what counts as a mandate affecting counties, by clarifying the impact categories (daily operations, resource allocation, spending priorities) that define unfunded mandates.

Counties could delay or decline implementing certain state mandates if funding is not provided.
The balance of cost between the state and counties could shift, with the state needing to supply funds to enable implementation.
The change would apply to local government operations at the county level under the specified Minnesota Statutes chapters.

Showing the most recent version. There are 1 total versions. You must be logged in to view additional bill text versions.

Date	Chamber	Type	Name	Committee Name
March 25, 2026	Senate	Action	Introduction and first reading
March 25, 2026	Senate	Action	Referred to	State and Local Government
Showing the 5 most recent stages. This bill has 2 stages in total. Log in to view all stages

You must be logged in to view citations.

17%

In Committee