SF5087
Public nuisance cause of action for certain conduct related to the sale, marketing, importing, distribution, and manufacturing of firearms establishment
Legislative Session 94 (2025-2026)
Related bill: HF4848
AI Generated Summary
Purpose
To create a new civil remedy aimed at reducing harms linked to the sale, marketing, importing, distribution, and manufacturing of firearm-related products. The bill establishes a public nuisance cause of action against a firearm industry member and sets up enforcement mechanisms to prevent and remedy harms to public safety.
Key terms and definitions (as used in the bill)
- Firearm industry member: a person or business engaged in the sale, manufacturing, distribution, importing, or marketing of a firearm-related product.
- Firearm-related product: a product that was sold, made, distributed, or marketed in Minnesota; or intended to be sold or marketed in Minnesota; or possessed in Minnesota with reasonable foreseeability that it would be possessed or used there.
- Firearm-related product (examples): firearm, ammunition, firearm component (including unfinished frames or receivers), or firearm accessory.
- Straw purchaser: a person who buys a firearm-related product on behalf of another person who cannot legally buy it; excludes genuine gifts to someone legally allowed to possess a firearm.
- Public nuisance: a condition that injures, endangers, or threatens public health, safety, peace, comfort, or convenience.
- Reasonable controls: safeguards and business practices designed to prevent straw purchases, trafficking, unlawful possession, theft, and to ensure compliance with state and federal law.
- Proximate cause: the firearm industry member’s conduct is a cause of harm to the public if the harm is a reasonably foreseeable result of that conduct.
- Firearm trafficker: a person who acquires or transfers firearms for illegal commerce.
- Injunction, abatement, damages: traditional legal remedies the bill authorizes in enforcement actions.
Main provisions and what the bill seeks to accomplish
- Nuisance prohibition (Subd. 2): A firearm industry member may not knowingly or recklessly create, maintain, or contribute to a public nuisance through the sale, manufacturing, importing, distribution, or marketing of firearm-related products.
- Required controls (Subd. 3): Firearm industry members must establish and implement reasonable controls regarding manufacture, sale, distribution, use, and marketing of firearm-related products to prevent illegal activities and ensure compliance with law.
- Violation = public nuisance (Subd. 4): Violating the nuisance prohibition or the required controls constitutes a public nuisance.
- Proximate cause (Subd. 5): The industry member’s conduct can be a proximate cause of public nuisance if the harm is a reasonably foreseeable result of that conduct, even if third parties commit crimes or intervene.
- Enforcement by attorney general (Subd. 6): The attorney general can sue to obtain injunctions, require abatement at the industry member’s expense, pursue restitution and both compensatory and punitive damages, recover costs and attorney fees, and seek other relief.
- Private right of action (Subd. 7): Individuals harmed by violations can sue for injunctive relief, damages, and attorney fees. Filings must include notice to the attorney general within five days.
- No required proof of intent (Subd. 8): To prevail, a plaintiff does not need to prove the industry member acted with the intent to create a nuisance.
- Construction and constitutional compatibility (Subds. 9–10): The section must be interpreted consistent with the Minnesota and United States constitutions and does not restrict or alter other legal rights or remedies, including existing common law actions.
- Effect on other remedies: The new nuisance remedy is designed to complement, not replace, other legal remedies.
Significant changes to existing law
- Creates a novel civil action: Establishes a public nuisance cause of action specifically targeting firearm-related product sales and related activities by firearm industry members.
- Expands enforcement tools: Adds both a government enforcement route (attorney general) and a private right of action for individuals harmed by the industry’s conduct.
- Introduces defined obligations: Requires firearm industry members to implement “reasonable controls” to prevent straw purchasing, trafficking, illegal possession, and other unlawful activities.
- Broadens remedies available: Enables injunctive relief, abatement, restitution, and both compensatory and punitive damages, along with attorney fees and costs.
- Relates to foreseeable harm: Applies proximate cause standards to determine when industry conduct contributes to public nuisance, even if intervening criminal acts occur.
- Protects constitutional rights and other remedies: Explicitly preserves existing legal rights and remedies and ensures alignment with constitutional requirements.
Relevant Terms - public nuisance - firearm industry member - firearm-related product - straw purchaser - firearm trafficker - reasonable controls - proximate cause - injunction - abatement - restitution - compensatory damages - punitive damages - attorney fees - private right of action - enforcement by attorney general - unlawful manufacture/sale/possession/marketing - foreseeability - Minnesota Constitution - United States Constitution
Actions
| Date | Chamber | Where | Type | Name | Committee Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| April 13, 2026 | Senate | Action | Introduction and first reading | ||
| April 13, 2026 | Senate | Action | Referred to | Judiciary and Public Safety | |
| Showing the 5 most recent stages. This bill has 2 stages in total. Log in to view all stages | |||||
Citations
You must be logged in to view citations.
Progress through the legislative process
Sponsors
You must be logged in to view sponsors.