HF4152 (Legislative Session 94 (2025-2026))

Health plans required to credit enrollees for services provided by an out-of-network provider at a lower cost than the plan's in-network providers, and commissioner of commerce enforcement authorized.

Related bill: SF3993

AI Generated Summary

Purpose

  • This bill would require health plan companies to provide enrollees with clear cost information and create a new credit system for services obtained from out-of-network providers. The goal is to help enrollees understand and manage costs when using out-of-network care, and to encourage partial reimbursement of the higher out-of-network costs.

Key Provisions (What the bill does)

  • Disclosure of good faith estimates: Health plan companies must, within ten business days of a complete request, provide an enrollee with either:
    • a good faith estimate of the total payment the plan has contracted for with a specific provider, the enrollee’s share, and the enrollee’s out-of-pocket costs; or
    • the lowest allowable amount due for the service from a comparable in-network provider, for an out-of-network credit consideration.
    • Note: These estimates are not legally binding.
  • Definitions: The bill defines terms such as out-of-network provider, in-network cost difference, estimated in-network cost difference, and out-of-network credit.
  • Credit for out-of-network services: If an enrollee receives a service from an out-of-network provider and identifies a positive estimated in-network cost difference before the service, the health plan must issue a credit equal to 50% of that difference.
    • The credit can be applied immediately as an offset against the enrollee’s next payment, with certain limits.
    • Plans may require reasonable documentation of the good faith estimates, but cannot condition the actual service on obtaining the documentation.
  • Limits on credits: There is a maximum group of credits an enrollee can accumulate with a single health plan; credits may not be issued if the service is provided outside the U.S. or if the enrollee is delinquent on premium payments.
  • Prohibition on limiting plan design: Plans cannot impose cost-sharing, utilization review limits, or premium increases that would prevent an enrollee from using the out-of-network credit. This protection applies to existing plans, renewals, and changes.
  • Credit balance notices: Plans must provide a statement of an enrollee’s credit balance at least every specified number of months, showing accruals and uses.
  • Credit payout on plan termination: When a plan ends, the plan must pay the available out-of-network credit balance to the enrollee, with exceptions for nonpayment, misrepresentation, or fraud.
  • Application timing: The credit rules apply after the enrollee has met their plan’s deductible, to avoid affecting eligibility for certain tax-advantaged accounts or plans.
  • Enforcement: The Minnesota Commissioner of Commerce can investigate and enforce these provisions.
  • Tax treatment: The value of the out-of-network credit balance paid to an enrollee becomes a subtraction for state tax purposes.

How this changes existing law

  • Introduces a formal requirement for disclosure of good faith estimates of costs.
  • Creates a mandatory 50% credit of the estimated in-network cost difference for out-of-network services.
  • Establishes rules for how and when credits are applied, reported, and paid out, including immediate offset and annual/periodic balance notices.
  • Prohibits certain plan design changes or premium adjustments that would undermine the benefit.
  • Adds enforcement authority for the state’s Commissioner of Commerce.
  • Adds a tax subtraction treatment for credit balances, affecting state tax calculations.

Significant Changes to Health Plans

  • New obligation to offer predictable cost information within 10 business days.
  • New obligation to provide a substantial credit for out-of-network services (50% of the estimated in-network difference).
  • New protections to ensure credits aren’t blocked by plan design changes and that balances are transparently communicated.
  • New termination payout requirement of available credits.
  • New enforcement and tax treatment provisions related to these credits.

Enforcement and Oversight

  • The Commissioner of Commerce will oversee and enforce these provisions, including investigations as needed.
  • Applies to existing and new plans, renewals, and changes within the state.

Definitions to Note

  • Out-of-network credit, estimated in-network cost difference, in-network cost difference, good faith estimate, allowable amount, out-of-network provider, and related terms used to describe costs, credits, and timing.

Practical Implications for Enrollees

  • If you choose an out-of-network provider and know there is a positive cost difference, you could receive a credit for 50% of that difference.
  • You’ll get a clear estimate of costs ahead of time, though it’s not a binding quote.
  • Your credit balance will be reported to you periodically and can be used to offset future payments, potentially reducing out-of-pocket spending.
  • When you leave the plan, you should receive any remaining credits, unless there are exceptions for nonpayment or fraud.
  • The plan cannot impose new charges or restrictions to block your ability to use these credits.

Relevant Terms out-of-network credit; good faith estimate; allowable amount; in-network cost difference; estimated in-network cost difference; out-of-network provider; health plan credit; next payment offset; deductible; health savings account (HSA) eligibility; catastrophic health plan eligibility; commissioner of commerce; notice of credit balance; credit balance; international vs domestic service; nonpayment; misrepresentation; fraud; utilization review; premium increase; enforcement.

Bill text versions

Actions

DateChamberWhereTypeNameCommittee Name
March 12, 2026HouseActionIntroduction and first reading, referred toCommerce Finance and Policy

Citations

 
[
  {
    "analysis": {
      "added": [
        "Requires good faith estimate to be provided within ten business days of a complete request.",
        "Specifies the estimate content: total payment, enrollee costs, and an out-of-network credit reference."
      ],
      "removed": [],
      "summary": "Amends Minnesota Statutes 2024 section 62J.81, subdivision 1a, to require a health plan company to provide a good faith estimate upon request for specific health care services, including the allowable amount contracted with a network provider, the enrollee's portion and out-of-pocket costs, and the lowest allowable amount for an out-of-network credit, with geographic accessibility considerations.",
      "modified": [
        "Adds clarification that the good faith estimate is not a legally binding estimate of the allowable amount or enrollees’ out-of-pocket costs."
      ]
    },
    "citation": "62J.81",
    "subdivision": "subdivision 1a"
  },
  {
    "analysis": {
      "added": [
        "Defines terms including estimated in-network cost difference and out-of-network credit.",
        "Requires credit to be 50% of the estimated in-network cost difference."
      ],
      "removed": [],
      "summary": "Adds the framework for an out-of-network credit under Minnesota Statutes 62J.829, including definitions, credit calculation (50% of the estimated in-network cost difference), application rules, and enforcement.",
      "modified": [
        "Establishes that credits apply as an offset, may require documentation of good faith estimates, and limits on when credits may be issued or applied."
      ]
    },
    "citation": "62J.829",
    "subdivision": "subdivision 1"
  },
  {
    "analysis": {
      "added": [
        "Out-of-network credit balance paid under 62J.829(5) is treated as a subtraction on the enrollee’s Minnesota income tax."
      ],
      "removed": [],
      "summary": "Adds Subdivision 40 to Minnesota Statutes 2024 section 290.0132 to address tax treatment of the out-of-network credit balance, specifying that the amount paid to an enrollee under 62J.829 subdivision 5 is a subtraction.",
      "modified": []
    },
    "citation": "290.0132",
    "subdivision": "Subdivision 40"
  },
  {
    "analysis": {
      "added": [
        "Noted enforcement authority under section 45.027."
      ],
      "removed": [],
      "summary": "References enforcement authority for the new provisions to Minnesota Statutes section 45.027, enabling the commissioner of commerce to investigate and enforce as provided by existing law.",
      "modified": []
    },
    "citation": "45.027",
    "subdivision": ""
  },
  {
    "analysis": {
      "added": [],
      "removed": [],
      "summary": "Cites federal law related to health savings account (HSA) eligibility, referenced in the bill's application provisions.",
      "modified": [
        "Acknowledges potential impact on HSA eligibility under 26 U.S.C. § 223."
      ]
    },
    "citation": "26 U.S.C. § 223",
    "subdivision": ""
  },
  {
    "analysis": {
      "added": [],
      "removed": [],
      "summary": "Cites federal law related to catastrophic health plan eligibility, referenced in the bill's application provisions.",
      "modified": [
        "Acknowledges potential impact on catastrophic health plan eligibility under 42 U.S.C. § 18022e."
      ]
    },
    "citation": "42 U.S.C. § 18022e",
    "subdivision": ""
  }
]

Progress through the legislative process

17%
In Committee
Loading…