SF3993

Health plans to credit enrollees for services provided by out-of-network provider at a lower cost than the plan's in-network providers
Legislative Session 94 (2025-2026)

Related bill: HF4152

AI Generated Summary

Purpose

  • To require health plan companies to credit enrollees who receive health care services from out-of-network providers when the out-of-network cost would be lower than the plan’s in-network cost.
  • To provide a process for enrollees to obtain a good faith cost estimate and to receive an out-of-network credit that lowers the enrollee’s final payment.

Main provisions

  • Good faith cost estimates (Section 62J.81, subdivision 1a)

    • Health plan companies must, within ten business days after a complete request, provide an enrollee (or their designee) with:
    • A good faith estimate of the total payment the plan has contracted for with a specified network provider for a health care service, plus the enrollee’s share (out-of-pocket costs), or
    • The lowest total payment the enrollee would owe for the service from any provider comparable to the out-of-network provider, considering geographic accessibility.
    • The estimate is not a legally binding quote.
    • A complete request includes all information the plan needs to issue the estimate (forms may be required).
  • Definitions used for credits (Section 62J.829)

    • Estimated in-network cost difference: good faith in-network estimate minus the out-of-network estimate.
    • Out-of-network credit: a credit equal to 50% of the estimated in-network cost difference.
    • The plan may ask for documentation of the good faith estimates but cannot require it before the enrollee receives the service.
  • When credits must be issued (Subdivision 2)

    • Plans must issue an out-of-network credit if the enrollee received care from an out-of-network provider and identified a positive estimated in-network cost difference before the service.
    • The credit equals 50% of the estimated difference.
    • The credit may be applied as an offset to the enrollee’s next due payment and should be applied immediately unless the enrollee requests otherwise.
    • The enrollee’s obligation to use the credit is subject to a limit on total credits per plan per enrollee (see below for the cap note).
  • Limits and restrictions (Subdivision 2)

    • Credits are not available if:
    • The service is provided outside the United States, or
    • The enrollee is delinquent on premium payments.
    • There is a maximum total amount of out-of-network credits an enrollee may have with a single health plan (the exact cap is not specified in the provided text).
  • No punitive design changes (Subdivision 3)

    • Health plans may not impose cost-sharing, utilization review limits, or premium increases that would reduce an enrollee’s ability to receive or use an out-of-network credit.
    • A premium or cost-sharing change tied to the credit is considered a limit on the enrollee’s ability to receive the benefit.
  • Notices of credit balance (Subdivision 4)

    • Plans must provide an enrollee with a statement of their credit balance at least periodically (frequency is described in the bill but not specified in the excerpt).
  • Credit balance treatment at plan termination (Subdivision 5)

    • If a plan ends for any reason, the plan must pay the available out-of-network credit balance to the enrollee, except in cases of nonpayment of premiums, material misrepresentation, or fraud.
  • Application timing (Subdivision 6)

    • If applying the credit before an enrollee meets their deductible would affect tax-advantaged accounts (like an HSA) or catastrophic coverage eligibility, the credit applies only after the enrollee meets the deductible.
  • Enforcement (Subdivision 7)

    • The Minnesota Commissioner of Commerce can investigate and enforce these provisions using its existing authority.
  • Related amendment to another statute (Section 3)

    • Adds a reference to “out-of-network credit balance” in Minnesota Statutes, indicating how the credit balance is treated for purposes of subtraction in a related provision.

Significant changes to existing law

  • Creates a formal framework for out-of-network credits:
    • Introduces the concept of an out-of-network credit equal to 50% of the estimated in-network cost difference.
    • Establishes a process for obtaining and applying good faith estimates.
    • Requires disclosures and ongoing credit balance reporting.
    • Adds enforcement by the Commissioner of Commerce.
  • Amends multiple statutes to incorporate the credit system:
    • Adds details to section 62J.81 (disclosures to enrollees) and 62J.829 (credit mechanics) and references to out-of-network credit balances in related statutory provisions (e.g., 290.0132).

How this could affect enrollees and plans

  • Enrollees could receive a 50% credit when using an out-of-network provider if the out-of-network cost difference is positive and before the service is performed.
  • Credits can be applied immediately to reduce the enrollee’s next payment, and balances must be tracked and disclosed.
  • Plans must provide timely good faith estimates and cannot condition the credit on obtaining additional documentation after services are performed.
  • The bill imposes safeguards to prevent plans from using credits to justify higher premiums, more cost-sharing, or other limitations on benefits.

Enforcement and oversight

  • The Commissioner of Commerce would have authority to investigate and enforce these provisions.

Relevant terms

  • out-of-network credit
  • in-network cost difference
  • estimated in-network cost difference
  • good faith estimate
  • health plan company
  • enrollee
  • out-of-network services
  • credit balance
  • immediate offset
  • complete request
  • geographic accessibility
  • notice of credit balance
  • enforcement
  • Commissioner of Commerce
  • Section 62J.81
  • Section 62J.829
  • Minnesota Statutes 2024
  • 290.0132 Subd.40
  • deductible
  • out-of-network provider
  • cost sharing
  • premium
  • utilization review
  • misrepresentation
  • fraud

Bill text versions

Showing the most recent version. There are  1  total versions. You must be logged in  to view additional bill text versions.

Actions

DateChamberWhereTypeNameCommittee Name
March 02, 2026SenateActionIntroduction and first reading
March 02, 2026SenateActionReferred toCommerce and Consumer Protection
Showing the 5  most recent stages. This bill has 2  stages in total. Log in to view all stages

Citations

You must be logged in  to view citations.

Progress through the legislative process

17%
In Committee

Sponsors

You must be logged in  to view sponsors.

Loading…